Teaching deep thinking to a generation that can’t make it through a paragraph without checking their phone.
ChatGPT:
The Reading Crisis in Higher Education: From Despair to Design
Let’s start with the uncomfortable truth: the average college student today struggles to read, write, and think at the depth higher education once assumed was standard. Professors everywhere are lamenting what one recently called “functional illiteracy.” Their students, he argues, can’t sustain attention on a serious adult novel, can’t write beyond clichés, and can’t sit through a class without reaching for their phones.
The reaction to such complaints usually splits the room. One side rolls its eyes—“every generation says the next one is dumber.” The other nods grimly, convinced civilization is going down with TikTok. The truth lies somewhere less dramatic but more challenging: students are not worse; the world has changed faster than the classroom.
The professor’s despair isn’t imaginary. Reading stamina, depth of focus, and reflective writing have declined sharply. But this is not because students stopped caring—it’s because attention, literacy, and cognition are being reshaped by technology, economics, and culture. The solution isn’t to mourn the loss of old habits; it’s to rebuild new ones. Education has to adapt to the world students actually live in, not the one nostalgic faculty wish still existed.
This brief translates those complaints into a constructive blueprint for modern education.
1. Redefine What “Literacy” Means
Literacy is no longer just about reading books and writing essays. In 2025, it means navigating a world of text, image, sound, and algorithm—all woven into the fabric of daily life.
Policy Actions:
- Teach digital literacy as core curriculum. Students should learn to interpret news feeds, memes, data dashboards, and algorithms with the same seriousness once reserved for novels and essays.
- Incorporate media literacy and critical consumption. Understanding how persuasion works in digital environments—how bias, misinformation, and emotional design shape thought—is essential civic education.
- Treat multiple literacies as legitimate. Visual storytelling, video essays, podcasts, and interactive media can coexist with print literacy rather than replace it.
Outcome: Students learn not just to decode text, but to analyze and critique all the messages their world delivers.
2. Rebuild the Habit of Deep Reading
Yes, students struggle to finish The Overstory or Being and Nothingness. But dropping a 500-page book on a generation trained for swipe-speed cognition is not teaching—it’s hazing. Deep reading must be taught again, deliberately and incrementally.
Policy Actions:
- Scaffold complex reading. Break long works into segments with guided discussion, digital annotation, and checkpoints that promote comprehension and endurance.
- Layer difficulty. Pair challenging classic texts with contemporary or multimedia works that echo their themes.
- Make reading social. Use collaborative annotation tools like Hypothes.is or shared reading platforms to transform reading from solitary drudgery into community learning.
- Teach how to read. Offer explicit instruction in metacognitive strategies—note-taking, summarizing, questioning—skills most students were never taught.
Outcome: Students gradually regain the focus and confidence to tackle complexity without feeling alienated by it.
3. Redesign Writing as Process, Not Product
When students outsource essays to AI, it’s not just cheating—it’s a symptom of disconnection. They see writing as a chore, not a form of thought.
Policy Actions:
- Shift from single drafts to process-based writing. Use drafting, reflection, and peer feedback to make writing iterative.
- Integrate technology ethically. Teach students how to use AI as a thinking partner—summarizing, brainstorming, refining—without surrendering authorship.
- Diversify expression. Encourage writing that includes multimodal forms: video essays, blogs, scripts, infographics.
- Reinforce writing across disciplines. Every field—from biology to business—should teach clear communication as a central skill.
Outcome: Students learn that writing is how we figure out what we think, not just how we display it.
4. Design for Attention in a Distracted Age
Everyone’s attention span has collapsed, not just the students’. The average person checks their phone 150 times a day. Pretending students can “just focus more” is delusional. The design of education must respect the reality of attention as a scarce resource.
Policy Actions:
- Use shorter, active learning segments. Replace 75-minute lectures with 10–15 minute bursts followed by interactive discussion or reflection.
- Teach focus as a skill. Embed mindfulness, time management, and cognitive regulation into curricula.
- Banishing phones isn’t the answer. Instead, create learning that competes with them—immersive, purposeful, and participatory.
Outcome: Students train their attention rather than lose it entirely to the algorithmic economy.
5. Make Learning Purposeful Again
Many students see college as purely transactional: a credential factory leading to a job. The professor’s sadness that students no longer burn with the “sacred fire of knowledge” is touching—but irrelevant if students can’t see why learning matters to their lives.
Policy Actions:
- Integrate real-world relevance. Tie courses to social issues, local communities, and authentic problem-solving.
- Develop apprenticeships and project-based learning. Students learn best when knowledge produces tangible outcomes.
- Connect learning to identity. Encourage students to see education not as a path to employment, but as a way to build agency, judgment, and civic voice.
Outcome: Curiosity rekindled—not through nostalgia, but through relevance.
6. Invest in Faculty Re-Training
Universities still run largely on the assumption that professors know how to teach. Many don’t. Teaching complex, distracted, digitally fluent students requires new pedagogical skills.
Policy Actions:
- Institutionalize teaching development. Require ongoing professional learning in cognitive science, instructional design, and educational technology.
- Reward teaching innovation. Promotion and tenure should recognize excellence in pedagogy, not just publication.
- Create collaborative design teams. Faculty should work with instructional designers, psychologists, and media experts to build 21st-century courses.
Outcome: Professors are no longer nostalgic bystanders, but active architects of the new literacy landscape.
The Bottom Line
Students haven’t failed education; education has failed to evolve. The modern student isn’t illiterate—they’re differently literate, fluent in digital cultures but starved for depth. The challenge isn’t to lower the bar, but to build a new path toward it.
Real literacy in the 21st century isn’t about rejecting the screen or resurrecting the canon. It’s about creating readers, writers, and thinkers who can move between media, manage attention, and make meaning in a noisy world.
If universities can shift from nostalgia to design—from despair to adaptation—then maybe, just maybe, the next generation won’t be “functionally illiterate.” They’ll be functionally human in a digital age that desperately needs them to think.